According to the Constitution, the “suspended” Parliament’s speaker, Zulfaj, accuses the opposition of a blockade: Let them remain in the hall and vote against.

Zulfaj’s accusations regarding a blockade have resurfaced, citing constitutional grounds. He insists the opposition should attend the session and vote against the proposed action. Through a recent Facebook post, Jeton Zulfaj, acting as Prime Minister’s advisor, reiterated his concerns about the presidential elections.

Addressing the opposition parties directly, Zulfaj urged them to participate in the scheduled vote. He contends that the opposition’s objective is to obstruct the process, a claim supported by the Constitutional Court’s prior intervention. The Court previously halted parliamentary activity when the necessary votes were absent.

Zulfaj highlighted a past instance, noting that last year, when lacking sufficient votes, the opposition remained in session and voted against, effectively blocking progress. Now, with the required votes secured, he argues the opposition’s deliberate absence, citing the need for a quorum, is a tactic. The advisor to Kurt maintains that the opposition’s actions are intended to prevent the vote from proceeding, according to his perspective.

Topics: #zulfaj #opposition #according

2 thoughts on “According to the Constitution, the “suspended” Parliament’s speaker, Zulfaj, accuses the opposition of a blockade: Let them remain in the hall and vote against.

  1. The suspended Parliament’s speaker, Zulfaj, alleges an opposition blockade. He demands they occupy the chamber and vote against the planned measure, citing constitutional justification.

  2. The suspended Parliament speaker, Zulfaj, alleges an opposition blockade. He contends that they should occupy the chamber and cast votes against the planned measure, based on constitutional grounds.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *