Gzim Shala, a senior researcher at the Institute of Law in Kosovo (IKD), has publicly criticized the procedural approach taken by a member of the Independent Media Commission (KPM) regarding the suspension of a broadcast. Shala asserted that the statements made concerning the suspension were issued without adhering to established legal protocols. He emphasized that, according to his assessment, no formal violation had been established to date, meaning that any punitive measure requested at this stage would be premature.
Shala detailed the expected investigative process, arguing that the KPM member bypassed necessary preliminary steps. He stated that the process requires a comprehensive review of facts, the hearing of all involved parties, and a subsequent vote based strictly on law. “The procedure has not even started, and the KPM member went directly to the measure: the suspension of the broadcast,” Shala noted.
He stressed that the commission’s role is investigative, not immediate adjudicatory. The researcher further clarified that the authority to impose sanctions must follow a structured inquiry. Therefore, Shala argued that the body currently cannot justify a punitive action when the foundational review process has not been completed.
His comments underscore a deep concern regarding due process within the functioning of the KPM, advocating for adherence to established legal mechanisms before any disciplinary measures are enacted against media outlets.
Topics: #shala #kpm #cannot
Due process appears necessary when considering the suspension of broadcast content.