ASH for Corridor 8: The reasoning with UNESCO cannot be used selectively

According to ASH, the Deputy Minister of Transport and Connections from VLEN has faced criticism regarding the attribution of credit for Corridor 8. Critics argue that VLEN lacks both the political and institutional standing to claim ownership of the project’s success, stating that the development of the corridor is not solely the achievement of VLEN. The source suggests that the government’s decision-making process on major infrastructure projects often occurs without prior consultation with VLEN.

Instead of political messaging, citizens reportedly desire definitive answers concerning the completion timeline for the corridor, the reasons behind the reduction of allocated funds for 2026, and the necessity of ensuring the vital link connecting the country to Greece passes through Struga. Furthermore, the critique addresses the use of UNESCO standards, arguing that these guidelines cannot be applied selectively. The source posits that the criteria cannot constitute an insurmountable obstacle for the connection with Greece while simultaneously being dismissed when addressing issues such as illegal border crossings.

These points indicate a public demand for transparency regarding the project’s management and its broader national implications, moving beyond partisan endorsements.

Topics: #corridor #vlen #not

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *