Justice Minister Darko Kostadinovski addressed questions at a press conference concerning the proposed use of the Badenter mechanism within the Constitutional Court. He clearly stated his position on the matter, emphasizing a fundamental distinction between political and judicial spheres. The minister explained that the mechanism is appropriately suited for political considerations, particularly within bodies like the Parliament.
He viewed this approach as a healthy one, recognizing its value in political discourse. However, he firmly believed it was unsuitable for a purely legal institution such as the Constitutional Court. Kostadinovski asserted that implementing the mechanism within the court would be detrimental.
He argued that legal and constitutional arguments would be disregarded, replaced solely by other, potentially irrelevant, considerations. “Perhaps I was brutal,” he admitted, “but I said it would be better to close the institution.”
His reasoning centered on the court’s role as a strictly legal body. He maintained that the mechanism’s application would fundamentally undermine the court’s purpose and integrity.
The minister’s comments underscored the importance of maintaining the separation of powers and safeguarding the independence of judicial institutions.
Topics: #mechanism #stated #constitutional
Kostadinovski argued that the closure of the Constitutional Court would be a more suitable course of action than utilizing the Badinter mechanism.
Kostadinovski argued that the closure of the Constitutional Court would be a more suitable course of action than utilizing the Badinter mechanism.