Shkëmb Manaj’s stance on the matter was clear. Responding to Justice Minister Donika Gërvalla’s assertion that President Osman’s decree dissolving Parliament was rushed, Manaj utilized a Facebook post to articulate his position. He argued against the framing of the decree as either “hasty” or “unhasty,” instead presenting a more fundamental distinction.
Manaj asserted that the validity of any decree hinges solely on its adherence to the Constitution. He emphasized that President Vjosa Osman’s action concerning the division of Parliament is entirely consistent with the legal framework. The core of his argument rests on the idea that the decree’s legitimacy is determined by its constitutional alignment.
Ultimately, Manaj firmly maintained that the decree is, in fact, constitutional. He rejected the notion of a subjective assessment of its speed, focusing instead on the objective requirement of legal compliance. This response directly challenges Gërvalla’s criticism, solidifying Manaj’s support for President Osman’s decision regarding the Parliament’s division.
Topics: #decree #constitutional #division
The response to Gërvalla’s objection clarifies that the Ottoman decree regarding the Assembly’s division is lawful.
Shkëmb Manaj’s reaction to the situation was firm. In reply to Justice Minister Donika Gërvalla’s claim that President Osman’s dissolution of the Assembly was expedited, Manaj employed a Facebook post