The LSDM has accused Mickoski’s government of having adequate financial resources to support various tenders while simultaneously lacking the necessary funds to organize a potential citizens’ referendum. According to the party, this discrepancy suggests a prioritization of specific commercial contracts over mechanisms for direct public decision-making. The opposition party stated that the government’s financial capacity is questionable, arguing that the allocation of public money does not align with the needs of the electorate.
LSDM highlighted numerous instances where, in their view, substantial funds have been directed toward private entities. They cited examples including tenders allocated to the VMRO-DPMNE group, as well as specific contract awards to companies such as Mastef, Piramida Building, and Landi Group. The core of the dispute centers on the government’s budget allocation.
LSDM contends that the available funds are disproportionately channeled into these commercial tenders, suggesting that this spending pattern undermines the feasibility of holding a citizen-led referendum. The party argued that if the budget can accommodate dozens of tenders for various corporate interests, there should be sufficient money available to facilitate a vote that would allow citizens to decide on their own future. The accusation posits a pattern of spending that benefits select groups, contrasting this alleged pattern with the supposed inability to fund a broad public consultation.
LSDM’s statements underscore a deep disagreement regarding budgetary transparency and the appropriate use of state funds for civic engagement versus corporate contracting.
Topics: #money #referendum #lsdm
The LSDM has accused Mickoski’s government of possessing adequate financial resources for awarding various tenders while simultaneously lacking the necessary funds to organize a potential citizens’ re