This statement indicates that the EU might explore alternative methods for implementing the Association, without submitting the draft statute to the Constitutional Court.

The latest signal suggests the European Union might explore different approaches to the association’s implementation, foregoing the submission of the draft statute to the Constitutional Court. Gazeta Express reported on March 21, 2026, at 13:43, detailing this situation. During an interview with four Serbian journalists, the Head of the EU Office, Aivo Orav, addressed concerns regarding the association and the fact that it remains absent from current EU or Brussels discussions.

Orav explained that the EU has consistently demanded the statute’s referral to the Constitutional Court for an extended period. This has not occurred because the Court was determined to have no involvement, specifically lacking jurisdiction to evaluate the matter. “This position has been steadfastly maintained,” Orav clarified.

He underscored that this stance remains viable. The situation indicates a deliberate choice to proceed without judicial review, focusing on alternative strategies for the association’s development. The EU’s approach reflects a determination to manage the process independently.

Topics: #association #indicates #alternative

One thought on “This statement indicates that the EU might explore alternative methods for implementing the Association, without submitting the draft statute to the Constitutional Court.

  1. The announcement suggests the EU could investigate alternative strategies for enacting the Agreement, avoiding the presentation of the proposed document to the Court of Justice. This development, firs

Leave a Reply to Ardian Berisha Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *