Following the Gazeta Express’s withdrawal of the asset confiscation draft law on March 31, 2026, the project’s return occurred without adequate transparency. Vullnet Bugaqku, representing KDI, responded to the subsequent review process, expressing significant concerns regarding the absence of public involvement. He stressed that, after the Constitutional Court’s rejection of the draft law, institutions were obligated to commence a comprehensive public consultation.
This consultation should have adhered to democratic standards and prioritized transparency. Bugaqku highlighted the necessity of inviting key stakeholders, including civil society and international organizations, to contribute their perspectives. Participants should have been able to offer observations or recommendations concerning the proposed law.
He specifically recalled that the process lacked the required openness. The withdrawal of the draft and its subsequent return demanded a more visible and inclusive approach. Ensuring transparency throughout the review was paramount to maintaining public trust and upholding established legal procedures.
The entire situation underscored the importance of adhering to established protocols when dealing with such significant legal matters.
Topics: #draft #law #transparency
The proposed legislation for property seizure was sent back without openness after the Constitutional Court’s denial.