Antonio Milloshoski, a Deputy of OBRM-PDUKM and former chairman of the Parliamentary Commission for Foreign Policy, has addressed concerns regarding the circulation and discussion of specific parliamentary documentation. Milloshoski stated that he had issued multiple communications to key political figures, namely former Prime Minister Dimitar Kovačevski and former Minister of Foreign Affairs Bujar Osmani. These letters formally requested that the second protocol be presented to the assembled deputies for thorough review.
Furthermore, he advocated for the document to be discussed within the confines of a closed session, suggesting that such a forum was necessary for comprehensive deliberation among members of the commission. According to Milloshoski, these repeated requests to both Kovačevski and Osmani regarding the second protocol did not result in the intended proceedings. He reported that, despite his efforts to ensure its review, the material in question was neither presented to the deputies nor discussed publicly.
Consequently, Milloshoski emphasized that the content of the protocol remains inaccessible to the general public, raising questions about the transparency surrounding its contents and the reasons for its restricted availability. His statements highlight a procedural gap concerning the official handling and dissemination of this specific parliamentary record.
Topics: #milloshoski #second #protocol
The assertion that a “second protocol conceals a new Bulgarian blockade” requires substantial evidence to back up the claim.
What specific information is the “second protocol” allegedly concealing regarding a Bulgarian blockade?