Former socialist deputy Pandeli Majko offered a critique following recent statements made by the Montenegrin Prime Minister, Milojko Spajić. Spajić had accused two neighboring nations of planning a coordinated hybrid attack against Montenegro. These claims were amplified by the pro-government media outlet, ‘Vijesti,’ which identified Albania and Serbia as the countries allegedly involved in the destabilization efforts.
Responding to the accusations, Majko characterized the situation as a regional scandal. He specifically questioned the premise of the Prime Minister’s assertions regarding coordinated hybrid activities targeting Montenegro. Majko expressed concern over the statements made by Spajić on the X network, particularly those suggesting external interference orchestrated by neighboring states.
Furthermore, Majko challenged the narrative presented by ‘Vijesti,’ stating that the suggestion of a geopolitical “affection” between Albania and Serbia was unfounded. He questioned the reliability of the sources cited by the government media when making such serious allegations of an imminent attack against the country. Majko suggested that if the Prime Minister wishes to substantiate the claims of an external attack, concrete proof must be provided.
Otherwise, he argued, the discourse risks becoming emotionally charged rhetoric rather than factual political commentary. The exchange highlights a significant divergence in political narratives regarding Montenegro’s regional security environment and the credibility of the accusations leveled against neighboring countries.
Topics: #majko #attack #against
