Eugen Cakolli has publicly criticized the government’s recent allocation of 2 million euros intended for subsidizing air lines, characterizing the resulting governmental decision as problematic on both legal and procedural grounds. According to Cakolli, this specific action, coupled with the justification provided by Prime Minister Albin Kurti, represents a pattern of practices that he believes involves similar violations and the implementation of measures impacting specific demographic groups. Cakolli emphasized that the existing Law on Government strictly limits the scope of such financial decisions.
He stated that the government cannot authorize expenditures that fall outside the parameters of the current budgetary planning or the formally approved work plan. Furthermore, he questioned the transparency of the process, asserting that the necessary foundational documents are neither publicly available nor may not exist. In his critique, Cakolli maintained that the rationale presented for the subsidy, as well as the underlying decision itself, contributes to a pattern of procedural overreach.
He concluded by asserting that both the allocation and the subsequent justification constitute part of a broader set of violations and rhetoric that warrant scrutiny. The controversy centers on the legality of using state funds, specifically the 2 million euro figure, without adhering to established budgetary protocols.
Topics: #cakolli #decision #million
