Hasani asserted that the decree was plainly apparent from the air as being unconstitutional. He maintained that every aspect of the Constitutional Court’s ruling was valid and supported by concrete evidence. During Tuesday’s broadcast on KTV’s “Konfront” program, Hasani emphasized that the decree’s impact was entirely negligible.
The court’s judgment, specifically the sections referenced, provided exceptionally strong justification for its unconstitutionality, entirely based on established legal principles. Hasani argued that the decree’s effect was zero. He stated that if the decree had been permitted, it should have been immediately presented to the parliament for review.
Hasani reiterated his position, clarifying that the decree’s influence was nonexistent. The entire basis of his argument rested on the court’s detailed assessment and the evidence presented. He firmly believed the decree was fundamentally flawed and lacked any legitimate standing.
Topics: #decree #hasani #based
