GLPS Criticizes Draft Law on State Assets, Citing Lack of Transparency
The Legal and Political Studies Group (GLPS) has expressed concerns regarding the drafting and approval of the Draft Law on State Assets for the Verification and Confiscation of Unjustified Property. GLPS asserts that the process has been deficient in transparency and lacked sufficient public participation. In a public statement, the group evaluates the legal initiative as a valuable tool in combating corruption.
However, they argue that the government’s and parliament’s handling of the legislation fell short of democratic standards. GLPS contends that the development of the law was marked by a limited scope for genuine public consultation. Specifically, the organization highlighted a perceived lack of meaningful engagement with civil society throughout the initiative.
A public hearing conducted in the final stages of the legislative process was deemed insufficient, citing inadequate time allotted for review and consideration. GLPS emphasized the importance of robust oversight and broad stakeholder involvement in similar future endeavors. The group’s statement underscores the need for greater transparency and a more inclusive approach to addressing corruption within the state asset system.
Topics: #glps #public #process
