During today’s court session concerning the “Puls” case, the Prosecution continued its presentation of material evidence. Central to this evidence was a professional license that had been issued by the Ministry of Economy in 2012. Following the presentation of this documentation, the defense counsel formally requested that the Prosecution read aloud the specific clauses within the license.
Specifically, the defense sought clarification on the designated object and location for which the license was originally granted, as well as the exact scope of hotel activities the legal entity was authorized to conduct under its terms. A thorough examination of the material evidence presented in the courtroom revealed significant discrepancies. The records indicated that the license was specifically issued to permit hotel activities—defined as a cabaret—at a property located on “Dimitar Vllahov” street.
However, this location contrasts sharply with the actual site of the “Puls” object, which is situated on “Krizhevska” street. Furthermore, the evidence highlighted that the incident under review occurred on March 16, 2025. These inconsistencies between the documented authorization and the facts of the case were noted during the proceedings, forming a key point of contention in the legal proceedings.
Topics: #license #issued #which
The address mismatch on the 2012 license seems like the key weakness in the prosecution’s evidence.