Ajlin Shishko-Hajdari, the Director for Culture, Youth, and Sport in the Municipality of Prizren, has issued a statement addressing recent accusations and dissatisfaction concerning the distribution process for local subsidies. In a statement published on Facebook, the director asserted that the entire subsidy allocation procedure adhered strictly to established legislation and internal protocols. Ms.
Shishko-Hajdari explicitly denied that the directorate held the authority to independently determine which entities qualified as beneficiaries. She clarified the scope of her department’s involvement, stating that her responsibility was limited to submitting proposals generated by the Project Evaluation Commission. According to her statement, the crucial tasks of evaluating and scoring the submitted applications were conducted exclusively by this specialized commission.
The controversy surrounding the distribution mechanism has escalated, evidenced by the filing of a criminal complaint by LVV concerning subsidies within Prizren. In relation to these proceedings, the director reiterated her procedural boundaries. She emphasized that, as the director, her function was to formalize the recommendations provided by the Project Evaluation Commission, ensuring compliance with established guidelines.
These statements serve to delineate the roles within the administrative process, placing the determination of eligibility and scoring power with the designated evaluation body rather than the directorate itself. The director’s defense centers on procedural adherence, maintaining that the distribution process was managed according to established municipal law.
Topics: #director #prizren #accusations