Eugen Cakolli, speaking from the KDI, asserted that Chairman Avni Dehari violated the Constitution and undermined the constitutional order regarding the scheduling of a legislative session. According to Cakolli, Dehari’s decision to schedule the continuation of the parliamentary session for the following day at 11:00 was improper, as the established deadline for such actions was the current day at 23:59. Cakolli stated that Chairman Dehari had an obligation to call for the continuation of the proceedings on the same day, ensuring the entire session could conclude before the established deadline.
He clarified the procedural nature of the 48-hour recess period, arguing that this limit is a procedural measure applicable only within the broader framework of the constitutional deadlines. The core of Cakolli’s critique centers on timing and adherence to established protocols. By scheduling the continuation past the stipulated time limit, Cakolli alleges that Dehari contravened established constitutional procedure.
The dispute highlights a procedural disagreement regarding the necessary sequence and timing for concluding the ongoing constitutional session. Cakolli maintains that adherence to the precise schedule is critical to upholding the integrity of the constitutional process. The statement issued by Cakolli details a conflict between the operational scheduling of the session and the mandated procedural deadlines governing the constitutional body.
Topics: #session #cakolli #constitutional
