Eugen Cakolli of the Kosovo Institute for Justice (KDI) expressed concern over the ongoing developments surrounding the constitution of the Parliament. Cakolli noted that the process appears to be exceeding established timelines, citing not only the initial 30-day deadline but also the utilization of a 48-hour extension previously employed to prolong the session. In a statement shared via Facebook, Cakolli argued that the normalization of constitutional violations, particularly when they appear to lack immediate legal repercussions, is a serious concern.
He specifically pointed out that the extension of the 48-hour limit, which was initially intended to bridge gaps beyond the primary deadline, compounds the issue. “In addition to the 30-day deadline being violated, the 48-hour limit is now also being extended, which was initially used as a tool to push the process beyond the deadline,” Cakolli wrote. According to his assessment, these procedural overreachings underscore the necessity of escalating the matter to the Constitutional Court.
He further highlighted the existing eight-day window for challenging parliamentary decisions. Cakolli concluded that the cumulative nature of these procedural delays makes submitting the issue to the Constitutional Court even more urgent. The addition of these extensions suggests a pattern of procedural irregularity that warrants judicial review.
Topics: #cakolli #addition #day
