Valon Bela has publicly responded to his recent designation as “undesirable” within Albania. In his statement, Bela questioned the implications of an administrative decision targeting a participant in the three national struggles, asking what message such an action conveys to the national memory. Bela addressed the ruling, stating that an administrative measure cannot legally negate the history, sacrifice, or contributions of an Albanian citizen.
He questioned the rationale behind the government’s declaration of undesirability against someone involved in the nation’s historical struggles. According to Bela, when an individual connected to the three national struggles is deemed undesirable by the Albanian state, the focus shifts beyond merely naming an individual. He argued that the action raises deeper questions about the perceived narrative of the nation itself.
He asserted that the concept of Albanians being divided into “inside” and “outside” the state borders, particularly when it concerns national ideals, is unfounded. Bela emphasized that the sacrifices made by patriots are not subject to such administrative categorization. His commentary suggests that the ruling is viewed by him and others as an attempt to undermine shared national memory rather than a legitimate legal action.
Topics: #albania #valon #bela
