According to statements from LSDM, concerns have been raised regarding the handling of sensitive information related to ongoing investigations. The group suggests that the entity OBRM-PDUKM is now aware of the implications surrounding investigations and the necessity of maintaining information confidentiality. LSDM points to instances where, they allege, political maneuvering occurs when individuals wish to challenge opponents.
Specifically concerning a past incident, the group highlighted the handling of a suspected poisoning event in Gostivar. LSDM claims that when accountability for the poisoning was expected, the response emphasized confidentiality and ongoing investigation rather than transparency. The group alleges that for a period of five days, public information regarding the poisoning was withheld.
Furthermore, LSDM stated that institutions reportedly under the control of OBRM-PDUKM remained silent and inactive during this time. LSDM questioned the subsequent actions taken by the authorities, suggesting that rather than accepting responsibility for the initial lack of transparency, OBRM-PDUKM is attempting to redirect focus toward the concept of “information confidentiality.” The group publicly questioned the Prosecutor’s Office regarding the withholding of water analysis data, raising questions about the processes and accountability surrounding the handling of critical information pertaining to the poisoning case.
Topics: #lsdm #information #poisoning
