Following confirmation of KFOR’s gradual withdrawal from the bridge to enable the Kosovo Police to assume security responsibilities, AAK deputy Burim Ramadani addressed the matter. Speaking in his capacity as a security expert, Ramadani stated that he had formally communicated with KFOR, advocating for the removal of the coalition’s static military presence on the bridge structure. This declaration prompted a response from Lëvizja deputy Mefail Bajqinovci, who publicly dismissed Ramadani’s statements, characterizing them as highly questionable.
In response to the criticism, Burim Ramadani issued a further statement, cautioning that matters concerning national security should not be discussed by certain political groups. He emphasized that the decision regarding the withdrawal was not sudden but was the culmination of several months of intensive meetings and discussions among relevant stakeholders. The exchange highlights ongoing political discourse surrounding the security transition at the bridge.
While the international force, KFOR, is systematically reducing its operational footprint, the differing political opinions, represented by figures like Ramadani and Bajqinovci, underscore the complexity of finalizing security arrangements in the region. Ramadani’s insistence on the removal of the static KFOR presence, contrasted with the political commentary from his opponents, continues to frame the debate over the final handover of authority across the bridge.
Topics: #kfor #bridge #ramadani
