The defense of former President Hashim Thaçi remains steadfast in its challenge to the Specialized Prosecution’s actions. The Specialized Prosecution is accused of disregarding rule 136. Lawyer Lluka Mishetiq continues his persistent opposition to the Specialized Prosecutor’s Office’s evidentiary procedures.
He argues that the submissions are legally unsound. Responding to the Specialized Prosecution, Mishetiq has once again demanded a cessation of evidence delivery, particularly given the impending closure of the case involving Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli, Rexhep Selimi, and Jakup Krasniqi. Initially, on March 13th, Mishetiq formally requested the presiding body to instruct the Prosecution to refrain from presenting further evidence.
This tenacious stance reflects a deep concern about the process. Subsequently, on March 25th, Chief Specialized Prosecutor Kimberly West denied his request. The Specialized Prosecution maintains that the evidence presented fully meets all necessary criteria and does not represent any violation.
Topics: #defense #specialized #tenacious
Thaçi’s legal team continues to firmly dispute the Specialized Prosecution’s actions. They allege the prosecution is breaching rule 136.