Eugen Cakolli described the restriction of access to the Parliament hall as “scandalous” and “unacceptable.” Speaking on the matter, Cakolli asserted that the closure of the hall doors to deputies represented a significant procedural issue requiring immediate clarification. According to statements reported by Gazeta Express, Cakolli questioned the authority of the Chairman of the Constitutional Session regarding the physical management of the premises. He emphasized that the Chairman’s role, he stated, is limited to guiding the proceedings of the session itself, rather than controlling physical access to the hall.
Cakolli further addressed the function of the administrative body supporting the parliamentary work. He argued that the administration’s purpose is fundamentally to facilitate and enable deputies in the effective execution of their mandated duties, not to obstruct them. Given this premise, Cakolli demanded that the source of the decision leading to the closure be immediately identified.
He stressed the necessity of knowing precisely who issued the order for the administration to take such restrictive action against the deputies. The controversy surrounding the physical access to the parliamentary hall has prompted calls for accountability regarding the directive that resulted in the situation Cakolli termed “scandalous.”
Topics: #cakolli #hall #scandalous
